←back to thread

450 points homebrewer | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.641s | source
Show context
dredmorbius ◴[] No.44367435[source]
One class of items not listed here, which I'd recently started to think might be less-than-optimal: pepper sold in jars with built-in, plastic, grinders.

I'd long since noted that as the jar emptied the grinders were increasingly ineffective. Thinking on why that might be ... I realised that this was because as you grind the pepper, you're also grinding plastic directly into your food.

There's surprisingly little discussion about this that I can find, though this 5 y.o. Stackexchange question addresses the concern:

<https://cooking.stackexchange.com/questions/103003/microplas...>

Seems to me that plastic grinders, whether disposable or sold as (apparently) durable products, are a class of products which simply shouldn't exist.

Searching, e.g., Walmart for "plastic grinders" turns up five listings presently, though it's not clear whether it's the body or the grinder itself which is plastic. In several cases it seems to be the latter.

<https://www.walmart.com/c/kp/plastic-grinders>

(Archive of current state: <https://archive.is/yIIX4>

replies(11): >>44367605 #>>44367859 #>>44368266 #>>44368968 #>>44369162 #>>44369302 #>>44370201 #>>44370308 #>>44370419 #>>44372320 #>>44372576 #
agotterer ◴[] No.44367859[source]
Thanks, I hadn’t considered the plastic on the pepper grinder. Guess I’ll be looking for a new pepper grinder as I continue my pursuit of removing plastic and dangerous chemicals from the kitchen. So far the pans, tupperware, and cooking utensils have all been replaced.

While not food, another not so frequently talked about plastic exposure could be clothing dryer vents pushing materials from synthetic clothing into the air. It’s likely less of a problem than the rubber tires on our cars making their way into the air. But it was something that occurred to me while cleaning out the dryer vent this past weekend.

replies(4): >>44368174 #>>44368345 #>>44368959 #>>44372203 #
johncole ◴[] No.44368345[source]
Your biggest exposure is going to be water, hands down. What you store it in, how you filter it, these are going to be major sources of plastics and pfas.
replies(3): >>44368610 #>>44370612 #>>44381179 #
skrtskrt ◴[] No.44368610[source]
Yes and PFAS/PFOS is now getting directly linked to rise in colorectal cancers.

Personally I would prioritize water filtering for PFAS over microplastics worries if you have limited budget to start changing consumption patterns.

replies(2): >>44368704 #>>44368713 #
j-conn ◴[] No.44368713[source]
Any specific products you’d recommend for this?
replies(1): >>44373311 #
1. SchemaLoad ◴[] No.44373311[source]
Reverse osmosis is pretty much the gold standard for removing PFAS. You can get countertop units for a reasonable price. Look for the lab testing or certifications rather than random anecdotes since they appear to work fine to the end user.
replies(1): >>44375381 #
2. modo_mario ◴[] No.44375381[source]
As someone new to this how do the details work? Do you need to buy a new membrane often like I imagine? Do you have any issues with your water lacking minerals? (in the same way drinking distilled water is bad for you)
replies(1): >>44382564 #
3. SchemaLoad ◴[] No.44382564[source]
The model I have says to replace the filter once a year, and it's $170 AUD. I imagine you could probably get away with using it longer than the OEM recommendation though.

I had the same thought about demineralised water, you can get more expensive models which remineralise the water after, but it looks like it's not actually that important health wise because you get the absolute vast majority of your minerals through food, not water. And remineralisation is mostly for taste rather than health. Though I don't find the demineralised water tastes bad, but if you're used to drinking hard water it might be different.