←back to thread

MCP is eating the world

(www.stainless.com)
335 points emschwartz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
0x500x79 ◴[] No.44367530[source]
I believe that MCP is a bit over-marketed.

MCP allows you to bring tools to agents you don't control. It's awesome, but it isn't the right match for every problem. If you believe the hype of X/LinkedIn you would think that MCP everywhere is going to be the solution.

Bringing tools to your local Claude client is awesome, but there are still challenges with MCP that need to be solved and like all technology, it isn't applicable universally.

Not to mention it's a recipe for burning tokens!

replies(6): >>44367740 #>>44367752 #>>44367901 #>>44367968 #>>44368623 #>>44371990 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.44367968[source]
> I believe that MCP is a bit over-marketed

MCP is pretty cool, but the way every AI influencer pivoted to producing MCP glorification posts at the same time has been groan-inducing. I can usually ignore the hype cycles, but I've been bombarded with so much MCP influencer content in the past few months that I feel exhausted every time I see those three letters.

replies(3): >>44368095 #>>44368185 #>>44368941 #
tptacek ◴[] No.44368941[source]
All influencer content is groan-inducing, but the idea behind MCP is pretty huge: it's the ability to link LLM agent loops into basically arbitrary APIs. It would be weird if it wasn't attracting a lot of attention.
replies(2): >>44369147 #>>44372439 #
OJFord ◴[] No.44372439[source]
Tool-calling is pretty huge, but MCP (a standard for calling a tool over HTTP) is way over-hyped, and neither here nor there really.
replies(1): >>44372527 #
1. tptacek ◴[] No.44372527[source]
MCP means you can get arbitrary tool calling from existing shrink-wrapped agents, like Claude Code, without writing your own agent. It's a big deal.