←back to thread

299 points LastTrain | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
jekwoooooe ◴[] No.44371503[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>44371559 #>>44371561 #>>44371569 #>>44371594 #>>44371629 #>>44371779 #>>44372065 #
treetalker ◴[] No.44371569[source]
Abandon all hope, ye who seek reflective reasoning from this government.

But my guess is that less public access to national information helps, and does not hinder, a speed-run to autocracy.

replies(2): >>44371685 #>>44371702 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.44371702[source]
I dunno. I'm very much not a Trump fan, but I don't see how restricting access to "national information" would help him. And if it would, how does restricting access to one of them help him?

I could more see this as being just random action without any real purpose, or aimed at petty revenge on someone, or something.

replies(7): >>44371725 #>>44371774 #>>44371976 #>>44372047 #>>44372358 #>>44372885 #>>44373400 #
LastTrain ◴[] No.44371725[source]
Everything they do is meant to sew mistrust. It doesn’t need to have any other benefit. I don’t think they are trying to hide anything, and I don’t think this is about staffing - they just want to wreck government and your trust in it.
replies(2): >>44372107 #>>44372361 #
1. mschuster91 ◴[] No.44372107[source]
> they just want to wreck government and your trust in it.

... and eventually, privatize the wreckage or cut even more services because it's obviously "not working out".