←back to thread

299 points LastTrain | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jekwoooooe ◴[] No.44371503[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>44371559 #>>44371561 #>>44371569 #>>44371594 #>>44371629 #>>44371779 #>>44372065 #
treetalker ◴[] No.44371569[source]
Abandon all hope, ye who seek reflective reasoning from this government.

But my guess is that less public access to national information helps, and does not hinder, a speed-run to autocracy.

replies(2): >>44371685 #>>44371702 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.44371702[source]
I dunno. I'm very much not a Trump fan, but I don't see how restricting access to "national information" would help him. And if it would, how does restricting access to one of them help him?

I could more see this as being just random action without any real purpose, or aimed at petty revenge on someone, or something.

replies(7): >>44371725 #>>44371774 #>>44371976 #>>44372047 #>>44372358 #>>44372885 #>>44373400 #
1. treetalker ◴[] No.44371774[source]
Taking your points in reverse order:

> I could more see this as being just random action without any real purpose, or aimed at petty revenge on someone, or something.

This was essentially my first point, and I think we are in agreement.

> I dunno. I'm very much not a Trump fan, but I don't see how restricting access to "national information" would help him. And if it would, how does restricting access to one of them help him?

I did not intend to claim that the closure necessarily helps Trump himself. My point was that reducing access to public information (either wholesale, or by placing additional hurdles) hurts democracy and favors autocracy.