←back to thread

Fun with uv and PEP 723

(www.cottongeeks.com)
619 points deepakjois | 10 comments | | HN request time: 0.562s | source | bottom
1. tpoacher ◴[] No.44371197[source]
What's going on? This whole thread reads like paid amazon reviews
replies(4): >>44371242 #>>44371285 #>>44371610 #>>44373972 #
2. indosauros ◴[] No.44371242[source]
What's going on is "we have 14 standards so we need to create a 15th" actually worked this time
replies(2): >>44371810 #>>44375310 #
3. ◴[] No.44371285[source]
4. oblio ◴[] No.44371610[source]
Occasionally the reviews match reality.
5. kibwen ◴[] No.44371810[source]
It works far more of the time than people give it credit for. There are a lot of good XKCDs, but that one is by far the worst one ever made, as far as being a damaging meme goes.
replies(2): >>44372255 #>>44377661 #
6. mturmon ◴[] No.44372255{3}[source]
"xkcd 927 Considered Harmful" ?
replies(1): >>44372832 #
7. nickagliano ◴[] No.44372832{4}[source]
Fantastic comment
8. kouteiheika ◴[] No.44373972[source]
Beacuse with uv finally Python dependency management is not a shitshow. The faster we get everyone to switch the better.
9. mmcnl ◴[] No.44375310[source]
To be fair, I've used Poetry for years and it works/worked amazingly well. It's just not as fast as uv.
10. hnfong ◴[] No.44377661{3}[source]
It's survival bias. You'd never see the confusion from would-have-failed standards-wannabes that xkcd927 helped prevent.