XBOW, an autonomous penetration tester, has reached the top spot on HackerOne

> XBOW submitted nearly 1,060 vulnerabilities.

Yikes, explains why my manually submitted single vulnerability is taking weeks to triage.

The XBOW people are not randos.

That's not their point, I think. They're just saying that those nearly 1060 vulnerabilities are being processed so theirs is being ignored (hence "triage").

If that's all they're saying then there isn't much to do with the sentiment; if you're legit-finding #1061 after legit-findings #1-#1060, that's just life in the NFL. I took instead the meaning that the findings ahead of them were less than legit.

Whether it is legit-finding is precisely what needs to be checked, but you’re at spot 1061.

>130 resolved

>303 were classified as Triaged

>33 reports marked as new

>125 remain pending

>208 were marked as duplicates

>209 as informative

>36 not applicable

20% bind a lot of resources if you have a high input on submissions and the numbers will rise

I think some context I probably don't share with the rest of this thread is that the average quality of a Hacker One submission is incredibly low. Like however bad you think the median bounty submission is, it's worse; think "people threatening to take you to court for not paying them for their report that they can 'XSS' you with the Chrome developer console".