←back to thread

302 points mastermaq | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.969s | source | bottom
1. FrustratedMonky ◴[] No.44370763[source]
Because of the partnership with OpenAI, I always assumed Copilot was just built on top of GPT.

So how did MS make Copilot Suck, if it started with same base?

replies(2): >>44370825 #>>44371073 #
2. bix6 ◴[] No.44370825[source]
Real talk! Copilot is so bad. It’s literally useless. And they charge an absolute arm for it. Like how is it soooo much worse than Chat? I am a frustrated monky when I use Copilot.
3. treesknees ◴[] No.44371073[source]
Microsoft Copilot uses their own model that is originally based on GPT-4 if I’m not mistaken.

But, it’s mostly a RAG tool, “grounded in web” as they say. When you give Copilot a query, it uses the model to reword your query into an optimal Bing search query, fetches the results, and then crafts output using the model.

I commend their attempt to use Bing as a source of data to keep up to date and reduce hallucinations, especially in an enterprise setting where users may be more sensitive to false information, however as a result some of the answers it gives can only be as good as the Bing search results.

replies(2): >>44371325 #>>44372929 #
4. FrustratedMonky ◴[] No.44371325[source]
Seems like with their own resources, and also owning part of GPT, they should be able to pivot and at least make a programming tool equal to Chat GPT.
5. Quarrelsome ◴[] No.44372929[source]
Bing isn't terrible though, is it? DuckDuckGo uses it, or at least used to, and that trade off was fine most of the time.
replies(1): >>44373099 #
6. treesknees ◴[] No.44373099{3}[source]
It’s not necessarily terrible. It just sometimes leaves you wishing it was “smarter”. When I get a bad result, trying the same query on ChatGPT gives a much better response.