/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
How Cloudflare blocked a monumental 7.3 Tbps DDoS attack
(blog.cloudflare.com)
265 points
methuselah_in
| 4 comments |
20 Jun 25 18:34 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.001s
|
source
Show context
losthobbies
◴[
24 Jun 25 13:52 UTC
]
No.
44366283
[source]
▶
>>44330585 (OP)
#
Dodgy IoT devices will be the end of us all.
replies(1):
>>44366592
#
bearjaws
◴[
24 Jun 25 14:22 UTC
]
No.
44366592
[source]
▶
>>44366283
#
It's wild to think with the proliferation of 1gbps fiber internet, even a modern pi board or old desktop is a potential 1gbps bot host.
replies(3):
>>44366877
#
>>44369703
#
>>44376673
#
franga2000
◴[
24 Jun 25 19:02 UTC
]
No.
44369703
[source]
▶
>>44366592
#
When your IP is found to have been part of a botnet, I think ISPs should just limit you to like 20Mbps for at least a year, so you think twice about buying that 10$ wifi baby monitor next time.
replies(6):
>>44370378
#
>>44370602
#
>>44371379
#
>>44380821
#
>>44384044
#
>>44392890
#
1.
hooverd
◴[
24 Jun 25 20:20 UTC
]
No.
44370602
[source]
▶
>>44369703
#
Thanks to CGNAT you, obviously an upstanding digital citizen, will also have to pay for your neighbor purchasing an IoT toaster.
replies(2):
>>44371662
#
>>44372263
#
ID:
GO
2.
BenjiWiebe
◴[
24 Jun 25 22:20 UTC
]
No.
44371662
[source]
▶
>>44370602 (TP)
#
Your ISP can tell you apart from your neighbor since they are the ones doing the CGNAT.
3.
ycombinatrix
◴[
24 Jun 25 23:45 UTC
]
No.
44372263
[source]
▶
>>44370602 (TP)
#
That doesn't make any sense. Who do you think is doing the CGNAT?
replies(1):
>>44373735
#
4.
hooverd
◴[
25 Jun 25 04:55 UTC
]
No.
44373735
[source]
▶
>>44372263
#
Yea, it would be bad practice to nuke an IP just because it was implicated in a botnet.
↑