←back to thread

450 points homebrewer | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
dredmorbius ◴[] No.44367435[source]
One class of items not listed here, which I'd recently started to think might be less-than-optimal: pepper sold in jars with built-in, plastic, grinders.

I'd long since noted that as the jar emptied the grinders were increasingly ineffective. Thinking on why that might be ... I realised that this was because as you grind the pepper, you're also grinding plastic directly into your food.

There's surprisingly little discussion about this that I can find, though this 5 y.o. Stackexchange question addresses the concern:

<https://cooking.stackexchange.com/questions/103003/microplas...>

Seems to me that plastic grinders, whether disposable or sold as (apparently) durable products, are a class of products which simply shouldn't exist.

Searching, e.g., Walmart for "plastic grinders" turns up five listings presently, though it's not clear whether it's the body or the grinder itself which is plastic. In several cases it seems to be the latter.

<https://www.walmart.com/c/kp/plastic-grinders>

(Archive of current state: <https://archive.is/yIIX4>

replies(11): >>44367605 #>>44367859 #>>44368266 #>>44368968 #>>44369162 #>>44369302 #>>44370201 #>>44370308 #>>44370419 #>>44372320 #>>44372576 #
1. moralestapia ◴[] No.44370308[source]
PlasticList is amazing and thank your raising these issues, it never crossed my mind and I use this everyday!

That linked StackExchange thread perfectly portrays why the site went down the drain.

>Maybe you'll ingest more microplastic on fish or proteins in higher food chain than grinders.

>If you drink tea you've got a lot more to worry about in terms of ingestion.

OK ... ?

>Your concern, although logically valid, is nearly impossible to regulate or even measure.

And yet, PlasticList is a thing.

>We're talking about amount that is, literally, microscopic.

Yeah Einstein, that's why they're called microplastics.

I am SO glad that place is extinct now.