←back to thread

296 points todsacerdoti | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.152s | source | bottom
Show context
qoez ◴[] No.44368208[source]
The counter argument is that the theoretical minimum is a few mcdonalds meals a day worth of energy even for the highest ranked human pure mathematician.
replies(1): >>44368346 #
1. tempodox ◴[] No.44368346[source]
It's just that no human would live long on McDonalds meals.
replies(3): >>44368615 #>>44368770 #>>44370807 #
2. bravetraveler ◴[] No.44368615[source]
President in the distance, cursing
3. floxy ◴[] No.44368770[source]
https://www.today.com/health/man-eating-only-mcdonalds-100-d...
replies(3): >>44369207 #>>44375969 #>>44376952 #
4. pfdietz ◴[] No.44369207[source]
Just don't drink the sugary soda.
replies(1): >>44372491 #
5. astrange ◴[] No.44370807[source]
Cheeseburgers are a pretty balanced meal. Low fiber though.
6. pylotlight ◴[] No.44372491{3}[source]
ye coke zero solves that right :P
7. imtringued ◴[] No.44375969[source]
This makes me wonder if there is a market for weight loss restaurants that automatically size your portions around your diet plan.
8. handsclean ◴[] No.44376952[source]
“Somebody survived this for about as long as one can survive starvation, and it made the news” is not ringing endorsement you think it is.