(www.eff.org)

278 points miles | 1 comments | 24 Jun 25 05:34 UTC | HN request time: 0.622s | source

Show context

daft_pink ◴[24 Jun 25 16:27 UTC] No.44367918[source]▶

I would really like a simple english explanation of what this does without the lobbying/agitator catastrophizing.

Are they saying that this act allows companies to watermark their content to prevent other companies from generating secondary content on their content?

How exactly does this act work?

replies(2): >>44368010 #>>44370278 #

1. fifteen1506 ◴[24 Jun 25 16:35 UTC] No.44368010[source]▶

>>44367918 #

I skimmed the text.

I think it is DMCA for images, tools and derivative works, along as all logging needed to track the creator, the tool and the publisher.

As I said though, I just skimmed the text.

↑

The NO FAKES act has changed, and it's worse