←back to thread

457 points benoitg | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.624s | source
1. pseudospock ◴[] No.44367443[source]
It has support for fish shell... I'll pass.
replies(1): >>44369077 #
2. bigfishrunning ◴[] No.44369077[source]
support for a shell you don't use is a negative? why? I don't personally use it, but I don't mind if other people do -- what's the problem here? just curious.
replies(1): >>44380694 #
3. pseudospock ◴[] No.44380694[source]
Fish shell detracts from people learning (and maintaining) to use POSIX compliant shell scripting. Professionals should be ready at a moments notice to use bash, zsh, and ksh. Also good to be familiar with a csh, (I would accept tcsh). Learn to use the tools of the trade, not toys.