←back to thread

The NO FAKES act has changed, and it's worse

(www.eff.org)
278 points miles | 2 comments | 24 Jun 25 05:34 UTC | HN request time: 0.612s | source
Show context
jekwoooooe[dead post] ◴[24 Jun 25 13:12 UTC] No.44365872[source]▶
[flagged]
Spivak ◴[24 Jun 25 13:24 UTC] No.44366000[source]▶
It would also mean the end of HN.
replies(2): >>44366222 #>>44369112 #
devwastaken ◴[24 Jun 25 13:46 UTC] No.44366222[source]▶
thats also good. online services need to be held responsible for what they host. no where else do they get magic exceptions to well established law.
replies(2): >>44366273 #>>44366609 #
PaulDavisThe1st ◴[24 Jun 25 13:52 UTC] No.44366273[source]▶
what other thing is there that is equivalent to online services publishing user-generated content?
replies(6): >>44366556 #>>44366578 #>>44366584 #>>44366644 #>>44366959 #>>44367031 #
1. hattmall ◴[24 Jun 25 15:04 UTC] No.44367031[source]▶
Literally anywhere with a flyer stuck on the wall. Or graffiti. Is the railroad liable for graffiti spray painted on trains? (Actually asking)
replies(1): >>44367168 #
2. PaulDavisThe1st ◴[24 Jun 25 15:17 UTC] No.44367168[source]▶
In all these cases, the person who adds "content" does so without permission from the owner of the thing to which it is added.