←back to thread

278 points miles | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
rootlocus ◴[] No.44364162[source]
> The new version of NO FAKES requires almost every internet gatekeeper to create a system that will a) take down speech upon receipt of a notice; b) keep down any recurring instance—meaning, adopt inevitably overbroad replica filters on top of the already deeply flawed copyright filters; c) take down and filter tools that might have been used to make the image; and d) unmask the user who uploaded the material based on nothing more than the say so of person who was allegedly “replicated.”

Sounds like the kind of system small companies can't implement and large companies won't care to implement.

replies(5): >>44364273 #>>44364780 #>>44365131 #>>44365529 #>>44366542 #
dspillett ◴[] No.44364273[source]
> Sounds like the kind of system small companies can't implement and large companies won't care to implement.

Or the sort of thing bigger companies lobby for to make the entry barriers higher for small competition. Regulatory capture like this is why companies above a certain level of size/profit/other tend to swing in favour of regulation when they were not while initially “disrupting”.

replies(2): >>44366318 #>>44366863 #
potato3732842 ◴[] No.44366318[source]
> Regulatory capture like this is why companies above a certain level of size/profit/other tend to swing in favour of regulation when they were not while initially “disrupting”.

Exactly. This is the big boy version of "even your petty backyard patio needs a PE stamp" type crap.

replies(1): >>44366855 #
1. ◴[] No.44366855[source]