←back to thread

GitHub CEO: manual coding remains key despite AI boom

(www.techinasia.com)
358 points andrewstetsenko | 1 comments | 23 Jun 25 20:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
agentultra ◴[23 Jun 25 22:06 UTC] No.44360677[source]▶
… because programming languages are the right level of precision for specifying a program you want. Natural language isn’t it. Of course you need to review and edit what it generates. Of course it’s often easier to make the change yourself instead of describing how to make the change.

I wonder if the independent studies that show Copilot increasing the rate of errors in software have anything to do with this less bold attitude. Most people selling AI are predicting the obsolescence of human authors.

replies(6): >>44360934 #>>44361057 #>>44361209 #>>44361269 #>>44364351 #>>44366148 #
1. giancarlostoro ◴[24 Jun 25 13:38 UTC] No.44366148[source]▶
> Of course you need to review and edit what it generates.

Treating LLMs as a scaffolding tool yields better results at least for me personally. I just brain dump what I'm thinking of building and ask for it to give me models, and basic controllers using said models, then I just worry about the views and business logic.