←back to thread

Starship: A minimal, fast, and customizable prompt for any shell

(starship.rs)
457 points benoitg | 7 comments | 24 Jun 25 11:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.618s | source | bottom
Show context
hiAndrewQuinn ◴[24 Jun 25 12:36 UTC] No.44365512[source]▶
I like maximalist prompts, and indeed Starship is what Shell Bling Ubuntu [1] installs on a new dev machine. But they're not everyone's cup of tea.

If I wanted to recommend to someone the min-maxed, highest density thing they could add to their prompt, it would simply be the time your current prompt appeared + the amount of time the last command you ran took.

These two pieces of information together make it very easy for you (or your local sysadmin (or an LLM looking over your digital shoulder)) to piece together a log of exactly what happened when. This kind of psuedo-non-repudiation can be invaluable for debugging sessions when you least expect it.

This was a tip I distilled from Michael W. Lucas's Networking for System Administrators a few years ago, which remains my preferred recommendation for any developers looking to learn just enough about networking to not feel totally lost when talking to an actual network engineer.

Bonus nerd points if you measure time in seconds since the UNIX epoch. Very easy and fast to run time delta calculations if you do that:

    [0 1719242840] $ echo "foo"
    [0 1719242905] $ echo "fell asleep before hitting enter" && sleep 5
    [5 1719242910] $
[1]: https://github.com/hiAndrewQuinn/shell-bling-ubuntu
replies(6): >>44365588 #>>44366612 #>>44367092 #>>44368319 #>>44369209 #>>44369984 #
skydhash ◴[24 Jun 25 12:45 UTC] No.44365588[source]▶
For personal workstation, the current directory is enough. Maybe I change the color based the status of the last command. That’s pretty much the only information I need before entering any command. Everything else can be accessed when I really need it.
replies(3): >>44365629 #>>44365734 #>>44365877 #
meesles ◴[24 Jun 25 13:13 UTC] No.44365877[source]▶
Problem is you can't get timestamps and run times of your commands 'when you really need it', unlike almost everything else
replies(4): >>44365985 #>>44366544 #>>44366632 #>>44367249 #
bayindirh ◴[24 Jun 25 13:23 UTC] No.44365985[source]▶
Why the timestamps are that important? Honestly asking.

You can always time your commands with "time".

replies(2): >>44366033 #>>44366052 #
1. bertmuthalaly ◴[24 Jun 25 13:29 UTC] No.44366052[source]▶
When you’re debugging, especially a complex system, especially during an outage or postmortem, understanding when your commands executed relative to when your log lines appeared is really helpful.
replies(4): >>44366096 #>>44366468 #>>44366844 #>>44368978 #
2. bayindirh ◴[24 Jun 25 13:33 UTC] No.44366096[source]▶
Oh, that's an interesting use case, alright.
3. styluss ◴[24 Jun 25 14:11 UTC] No.44366468[source]▶
sounds like your describing https://linux.die.net/man/1/ts
4. kccqzy ◴[24 Jun 25 14:45 UTC] No.44366844[source]▶
That's a poor and hacky substitute of using Linux audit features. It's perhaps the right robustness/complexity trade off for my personal machine, but for work they likely already have audit features turned on and you can access the timing from there.
replies(1): >>44367163 #
5. hiAndrewQuinn ◴[24 Jun 25 15:17 UTC] No.44367163[source]▶
I think you need to put a number on "likely", here. 80% of all workplaces, maybe? Even that seems a little high. There are a surprising number of devs who have never even heard of auditd. It's just not the kind of thing most people come across in their day to day work unless they go digging for it, or come from a security or DevOps background or something.
6. xorcist ◴[24 Jun 25 18:06 UTC] No.44368978[source]▶
That's a good reason to have timestamps in the history, which you should.

Something like

  export HISTFILESIZE=
  export HISTSIZE=
  export HISTTIMEFORMAT="[%F %T] "
  shopt -s histappend
really ought to be default in bash.

It's not as clear why you need it in the interactive prompt.

replies(1): >>44370082 #
7. hiAndrewQuinn ◴[24 Jun 25 19:32 UTC] No.44370082[source]▶
I didn't make it quite as clear as I should: the reason to have it in the prompt is mostly so that you, or someone you're working with, can spot a trend you may not consciously think to look for if the timestamps weren't in front of you.

It sounds silly, but it has saved my butt more than once. Especially if you have bugs that e.g. only show up once per hour on the hour, and are otherwise fine.