←back to thread

401 points Bluestein | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.844s | source
Show context
godelski ◴[] No.44357661[source]
They mention the Pixel and I just got to say, I wish someone would bring back the fingerprint reader on the back of the phone. That was seriously the best solution. Fastest way to unlock your phone, because no matter how slow the fingerprint reader is you activate it while pulling it out of your pocket. I honestly don't get why people like Face ID more (what I currently use). Someone, please bring this back
replies(35): >>44357832 #>>44357839 #>>44357899 #>>44357981 #>>44357994 #>>44358024 #>>44358206 #>>44358349 #>>44359432 #>>44359947 #>>44360324 #>>44360501 #>>44360673 #>>44360902 #>>44361187 #>>44361409 #>>44361426 #>>44361455 #>>44361579 #>>44362284 #>>44362293 #>>44362735 #>>44362894 #>>44362895 #>>44363102 #>>44363521 #>>44363552 #>>44363770 #>>44363816 #>>44363876 #>>44364093 #>>44364375 #>>44364759 #>>44379959 #>>44386473 #
ZeroWidthJoiner ◴[] No.44357981[source]
The backside fingerprint reader could even be used as an input device on some models for scrolling, or pulling down/up the notification bar. Great for scrolling through content or swiping through screens without having to cover your display for gesture input: https://www.androidauthority.com/miss-rear-fingerprint-scann...
replies(5): >>44358171 #>>44361697 #>>44363401 #>>44365800 #>>44365824 #
1. JeremyNT ◴[] No.44365824[source]
Ironically, some devices (Pixel 9 at least) have now added a tiny little touch sensor exactly where the fingerprint reader used to be - it doesn't read the fingerprint, but you can regain this functionality by mapping taps to actions.

I can't even imagine why they decided to keep the fingerprint sensor on the front but add a whole separate sensor on the back.

replies(1): >>44366772 #
2. mortos ◴[] No.44366772[source]
Are you talking about the feature "Quick Tap" in the settings where you can double tap the back? There's no sensor for that, they just use the accelerometer to detect that input. It's been incredibly unreliable for me.
replies(1): >>44376929 #
3. JeremyNT ◴[] No.44376929[source]
I suppose so! I didn't realize that's how it was implemented. I guess that explains the... less than stellar reliability.