←back to thread

538 points todsacerdoti | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
robenkleene ◴[] No.44358285[source]
I love this, I've been iterating on workflows like this for something like a decade now. Over time I've tried to peel back as many of my custom layers as possible, because all of those layers have a maintenance cost.

Stock Vim (without `tmux`) can actually do most of what's shared in this post with `rg --vimgrep restore_tool | vim -c cb -` (`vim -c cb -` is my favorite feature in Vim; I find it strange that it's so rarely used or talked about).

(Since re-running the `rg` search can be undesirable, and I often like to analyze results in a terminal before opening them in Vim. I use a custom `tmux` command to copy the output of the last command [using this trick that involves adding a Unicode character to your prompt https://ianthehenry.com/posts/tmux-copy-last-command/], then I send that into Vim with e.g., `tmux saveb - | vim -c cb -`.)

replies(7): >>44358653 #>>44358736 #>>44360925 #>>44362611 #>>44363893 #>>44364510 #>>44403351 #
msgodel ◴[] No.44358736[source]
Ten years ago I threw out my massive multi-file, multi-package vim config and have been slowly building up a much simpler vimrc about 1-2 lines a year. I completely agree, defaults in old software are almost always there for a reason and you should try to understand that before changing them.
replies(6): >>44359927 #>>44360624 #>>44361137 #>>44362231 #>>44363110 #>>44363602 #
eviks ◴[] No.44363110[source]
That would be true if you had universally great designers back then, which wasn't the case, thus the defaults are universally bad, so it's a bad heuristic to stick to them and force a waste in trying to understand them.

For example, why is the default vim cursor hjkl? Well, it's just that the arrows on the physical keyboard of one of the vim designers were drawn there. That's it. There is no deep thought in search of the best cursor position, and understanding the why is just learning a useless piece of trivia.

replies(5): >>44363298 #>>44363634 #>>44363864 #>>44364112 #>>44364424 #
sakjur ◴[] No.44363298[source]
That seems quite harsh. Just because the designers aren’t perfect doesn’t mean the design is universally bad.

To address your example: Why were the arrow keys on those particular keys? Who put them there? hjkl are on the home row, and touch typists end up having the movement keys under their right hand’s resting fingers. That’s suddenly quite convenient.

replies(3): >>44363377 #>>44363972 #>>44365532 #
bluebarbet ◴[] No.44363972[source]
As pointed out, this is wrong. What touch-typists want is jkl;, because the right home key is j. This is an absolutely necessary config change in vanilla vim, unfortunately.
replies(3): >>44364451 #>>44364846 #>>44368316 #
1. skydhash ◴[] No.44364846{3}[source]
I like the bindings, because I move vertically more than I move, so I want my strongest (other than the thumb) there. And I move to the right more than I do to the left. So I don’t mind moving my finger to do the latter.
replies(1): >>44365792 #
2. SirHumphrey ◴[] No.44365792[source]
It may be different based for others based on hand anatomy, but at least for me the index finger is so much stronger than the little finger, that it feels more comfortable moving it one space to the left, especially on keyboards with heavy keys (like model M).
replies(1): >>44370958 #
3. bluebarbet ◴[] No.44370958[source]
I will admit that I had never considered things like this (there's a couple of you making a similar point). It's a decent argument. Maybe I'll revert to the default and see if I can handle the change.