←back to thread

116 points baruchel | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
revskill ◴[] No.44363585[source]
We need a word-less world of math where all meaning is derived from figures. WOrds are confusing.

"If you can't describe the meaning using only pencils and compass, you don't mean it"

replies(2): >>44363632 #>>44365558 #
novaRom ◴[] No.44363632[source]
And especially when we mix different categories. Like saying about any infinity as about an object is misleading, because it's rather a process
replies(2): >>44363700 #>>44364602 #
1. kbrkbr ◴[] No.44364602[source]
I can think of N as a process in a sense, because I can keep adding a number. But I can't think of R as a process like this, specifically because there is no surjective mapping from N to R.

How would you think of R as a process?