←back to thread

193 points leymed | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
fuoqi ◴[] No.44359889[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>44359974 #>>44360016 #>>44360080 #>>44360349 #>>44361806 #>>44363227 #>>44363325 #
matsemann ◴[] No.44359974[source]
But the quote literally spells out it was market forces, not some instability in solar generation?

Your other comment probably got flagged because it started with a huge straw man and had multiple unwarranted jabs in it.

replies(2): >>44360082 #>>44360400 #
shakow ◴[] No.44360400[source]
True, but the market moves fast because renewables (or, more precisely, wind & solar) move fast.

There is not much fast trading to be done on a nuke/gas/coal/hydro powerplant ramping up or down, but there is a lot of instability (and thus market volatility) to be found in fast varying solar/wind conditions.

replies(1): >>44361380 #
stephen_g ◴[] No.44361380[source]
That's inaccurate on the whole though, because while those big generators can't move fast, demand can move fast! Which is a difficult problem to manage in baseload grids.

Renewables just change one set of challenges for another set, at the end of the day it's all manageable.

replies(2): >>44361574 #>>44364217 #
1. shakow ◴[] No.44364217[source]
It is a problem in baseload grid, but this is a global issue is shared with wind/solar – unless we find a way to sync demand peaks with wind/Sun peaks, that is solved by other means of energy buffering.