←back to thread

277 points cebert | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.267s | source
Show context
ecshafer ◴[] No.44361731[source]
This would probably only affect the people with the worst credit scores I imagine. I just don't see a ton of 800+ credit score people deciding to spend 5 payments of $20 for a pair of $80 shoes.
replies(7): >>44361754 #>>44361757 #>>44361785 #>>44361909 #>>44361928 #>>44361995 #>>44362067 #
p1necone ◴[] No.44361995[source]
Shifting a cost forward a couple months interest free is a great deal for people who are financially responsible, especially if you have some other loan (like a mortgage) that you could be paying off more of instead.

It's no different to the practice of using a credit card for everything and then paying off in full a month later because the credit card interest is lower (often zero if you pay off within a month) than the mortgage interest.

replies(2): >>44362061 #>>44362186 #
dehrmann ◴[] No.44362186[source]
I briefly looked into this, but I wasn't convinced the juice was worth the squeeze. My cash is automatically getting ~4%, but there's too much fine print to make sure the BNPL rate really is 0%, I'm sacrificing 2% cash back, and missing one payment makes the whole endeavor negative ROI.
replies(1): >>44362428 #
1. kjellsbells ◴[] No.44362428[source]
> fine print

I suspect this is where some buyers will get into trouble. Theyll think they made a payment, or they miss a notification that tells them to send this month's payment to servicer X not Y, and before they realize, boom they are in default and owe all the interest.