←back to thread

193 points leymed | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fuoqi ◴[] No.44359889[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>44359974 #>>44360016 #>>44360080 #>>44360349 #>>44361806 #>>44363227 #>>44363325 #
pdpi ◴[] No.44360080[source]
What I'm reading from that quote is that the issue wasn't renewables as such, but an issue of power generation reacting too quickly and too intensely to price fluctuations. "Renewables" only matter insofar as they're the sort of generation that, under the current regulatory regime, get to react to those pricing changes.
replies(4): >>44360277 #>>44360379 #>>44360461 #>>44361821 #
baq ◴[] No.44360379[source]
The report goes to great lengths to avoid certain words or phrases. The market failed here, it didn’t price in risk of grid collapse correctly.
replies(2): >>44360554 #>>44361562 #
mslansn[dead post] ◴[] No.44361562[source]
[flagged]
1. xwolfi ◴[] No.44361610{3}[source]
Except to point out that it's not nice that renewables arrive at random prices in the grid and start crapping all around it until they disappear when expensive again.

The stability of a nuclear plant vs the instability of a solar far when a cloud passes over.