←back to thread

401 points Bluestein | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.886s | source
Show context
strangecasts ◴[] No.44357341[source]
Was lucky enough to get my Fairphone 4 on sale, but I'd happily pay full price now - even though the Fairphones are pricey for the specs, unless you absolutely need 24 cores etc. I'd say they are worth it, knowing the company is at least trying to improve the parts supply chain, and knowing you stand a chance of fixing the devices yourself (luckily I've only had to replace the USB-C port, which was trivial)

About the only thing I'd ding Fairphone on is not communicating earlier that they were having trouble getting Android 14 out to the FP4s, but the security patches have been consistent.

(Okay I'm also dinging them on getting rid of the headphone jack, yes I know it's a lost cause... )

replies(8): >>44357460 #>>44357530 #>>44357755 #>>44357765 #>>44361120 #>>44361376 #>>44363162 #>>44366676 #
bombela ◴[] No.44357765[source]
The removal of the phone jack is so obviously planned obsolescence, it is ironic that this project for sustainability follows the trend.

Wired headphones still have better sound quality. Don't need charging. Don't break with software update. But because of that it means less consumption.

Think about how insane it is that companies can remove the phone jack and glue in the battery with the very obvious goal of planned obsolescence. And this is legal.

replies(12): >>44357796 #>>44357829 #>>44361101 #>>44361568 #>>44361763 #>>44362176 #>>44362295 #>>44362728 #>>44364277 #>>44364511 #>>44366017 #>>44370556 #
jack_pp ◴[] No.44357829[source]
I don't think it's about planned obsolescence. It's about cutting costs and having one less hole water can get in.

Also wired headphones are a very niche market. If you care so much there are wireless DACs that can feed your wired headphones better than any phone in history.

replies(4): >>44357890 #>>44357909 #>>44360713 #>>44362566 #
winternewt ◴[] No.44357890[source]
How do they avoid lossy compression?
replies(1): >>44360143 #
1. emsign ◴[] No.44360143[source]
By applying Psychoacoustics. Lossy compression is a problem long solved.
replies(1): >>44360791 #
2. meepmorp ◴[] No.44360791[source]
that's not avoiding lossy compression, that's choosing a form that people (hopefully) won't notice
replies(1): >>44361329 #
3. kayson ◴[] No.44361329[source]
By that logic, so is using 16 bits and 44khz sampling rate.
replies(2): >>44361394 #>>44361981 #
4. okanat ◴[] No.44361394{3}[source]
16-bit 44 Khz almost perfectly reproduces human hearing. It wasn't a coincidence that the makers of CDs chose it. Anything above is studio-grade stuff to give extra headroom for editing (applying filters in studio editing can amplify noise which is unwanted, for just playing audio there are no advantages).

With standard Bluetooth codecs you get nowhere close to that and there is a significant noticeable delay for video content. Headphone jack is easy to make IP68. All rugged phones have it and all non-rugged ones have a USB port which is bigger and more irregular than a frigging circle.

5. ◴[] No.44361981{3}[source]