←back to thread

112 points foxmoss | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
fimdomeio ◴[] No.44359038[source]
The great thing about those keyboards was that a lot of people could just turn off text prediction and type text with a single hand without looking at the screen.
replies(2): >>44359182 #>>44359497 #
jaffa2 ◴[] No.44359182[source]
Huh?

The great thing about T9 (certainly on the Nokia 3210 and 8210) back in the day was you could type messages fast with few k/s without looking. As long as you had enough experience to know the word combos.

Ive never found a t9 system as good as the Nokia implementation. In some respects its better than qwerty for short messages. And don’t get me started on apples fundamentally broken auto correct system. People dont know any better these days. There’s actual adults walking today that have never typed on a real keyboard.

replies(2): >>44359232 #>>44359775 #
justsomehnguy ◴[] No.44359232[source]
T9 works good for English and simple texts. If you need some other language, declensions, conjugations and non-Latin script things are no longer good.
replies(2): >>44359309 #>>44359790 #
1. spookie ◴[] No.44359309[source]
Eh you would abbreviate things to hell to get around it. Helped with sms prices on those days too!
replies(1): >>44359371 #
2. justsomehnguy ◴[] No.44359371[source]
Which makes T9 fail miserably because it works with a non-abbreviated words.

Later there were adaptive versions which had an auto-populated user dictionary but that made "a blind T9ing" prone to errors.

replies(1): >>44359849 #
3. Dilettante_ ◴[] No.44359849[source]
I want to say you could add custom words no problem? But it's been a hot minute, so I might be misremembering.
replies(1): >>44361590 #
4. justsomehnguy ◴[] No.44361590{3}[source]
Meh, Imma team Moto and I don't remember it well anymore, 20 years give or take.

Yes, the later variants both had a custom/user dictionary and could learn %he new words from the input. The latter could add the uncertainty in the input.