←back to thread

845 points the-anarchist | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
boramalper ◴[] No.44334361[source]
I suspect a strong link between mass surveillance (by corporations for advertising or by states for intelligence purposes) and the very recent targeting of the senior Iranian nuclear scientist and military officers at their homes in Iran.

Wherever you are from or whatever side of the conflict you are on, I think we can all agree that it’s never been easier to infer so much about a person from “semi-public” sources such as companies selling customer data and built-in apps that spy on their users and call home. It allows intelligence agencies to outsource intelligence gathering to the market, which is probably cheaper and a lot more convenient than traditional methods.

“Privacy is a human right” landed on deaf ears but hopefully politicians will soon realise that it’s a matter of national security too.

replies(13): >>44334595 #>>44334624 #>>44334697 #>>44334773 #>>44335164 #>>44335631 #>>44336225 #>>44336629 #>>44337014 #>>44337349 #>>44338148 #>>44344811 #>>44346475 #
kragen ◴[] No.44336629[source]
The truth is far outside the Overton window.

Yes, privacy is a question of civil defense in the drone age. But the existing crop of states will never acknowledge that; their structure and institutions presume precisely the kind of mass databases of PII that create this vulnerability, as well as institutional transparency for public accountability. This makes them structurally vulnerable to insurgencies that expropriate those databases for targeting. The existing states will continue to clutch at their fantasies of adequately secured taxpayer databases until their territorial control (itself an anachronism in the drone age; boots on the ground can no longer provide security against things like Operation Spiderweb) has been reduced to a few fortified clandestine facilities.

Things are going to be very unpredictable and, I suspect, extremely violent.

replies(2): >>44337277 #>>44339702 #
fpoling ◴[] No.44339702[source]
This has been going on in Russia on massive scale. For bribes officials sells anything including highly sensitive databases. Those were used to uncover various Kremlin-run assassins targeting oppositions. Then Ukrainian special services used those to target high-ranking Russian military officers. Russia tried to crack down on that but it just increased the database price tag.
replies(2): >>44340127 #>>44341309 #
mattigames ◴[] No.44341309[source]
If Putin didn't want bribery to go rampant he would set the example, and force other top leaders to do the same, but instead he flaunts his properties, yats, women that he enjoys; but it's probably a price too high for him to pay. I bet Xi Ping enjoys similar privileges but in much more private manner.
replies(1): >>44350596 #
chrz ◴[] No.44350596[source]
if you think you can stop bribery in communism regime then i have some news for you
replies(2): >>44350860 #>>44354710 #
1. aleph_minus_one ◴[] No.44354710[source]
Russia is not a communist country (anymore).