←back to thread

194 points rafram | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.842s | source | bottom

New York City has this cool program that lets anyone report idling commercial vehicles and get a large cut of the fines [1]. It's been in the news recently [2].

I've filed a few reports, and I found the process frustrating and error-prone. The forms are fiddly, there's way too much information that needs to be copied down from the video by hand, you have to use a third-party app to take a timestamped video and a different app to compress it before uploading, and approximately none of it can be done on your phone — the device you probably used to record your video in the first place.

I built Idle Reporter to make filing complaints into a five-minute process that you can do entirely from your phone.

Idle Reporter uses AI to automatically extract all the required information and screenshots from the video and fill out the form for you. It compresses your video, adds the required screenshots, and uploads the whole thing to DEP. All you have to do is log in, give it a final check, and submit.

The AI features cost me money to run, so I put those behind a subscription ($5.99/month, which can pay for itself after a single report). There's a one-week free trial so you can test it out. All the other features — including a fully-featured timestamp camera, which other apps charge for, and an editor for filling out the forms manually and submitting in a single step — will be free forever, as a service to the community.

The app is iOS-only for now — part of this was an exercise in learning SwiftUI in my spare time.

Check it out on the App Store and let me know what you think!

[1]: https://www.nyc.gov/site/dep/environment/idling-citizens-air...

[2]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-city-idling-law-report...

Show context
theptip ◴[] No.44348871[source]
I like the general idea, and I’ve been surprised this hasn’t taken off elsewhere, eg citizen videos for traffic violations like blocking intersections, it seems these should be ROI positive for the city to implement (lower enforcement costs, more ticket revenue).
replies(3): >>44349207 #>>44349221 #>>44349240 #
bluefirebrand ◴[] No.44349207[source]
I really don't understand why anyone would want this

Do you really want to live in a society where we're monitored for even the slightest infractions at all times and automatically punished regardless of any circumstances that might explain the behavior?

replies(6): >>44349258 #>>44349423 #>>44349784 #>>44349847 #>>44350753 #>>44353115 #
1. globular-toast ◴[] No.44353115[source]
This isn't about constant monitoring of people, it's about cars. I'm all for constant monitoring of cars within towns. They bully and intimidate and generally ruin places for everyone else. There needs to be strong incentives for people to not drive cars right into cities, with appropriate alternatives, of course.

I want to see much better parking on the outside of town with easy and safe travel to inside like light rail and bikes. All of this is possible if we take back what's been given to cars.

The biggest problem with drivers is they don't take responsibility for what they're doing. It creates a status quo where they feel empowered to do what they like and the rest of society bends to that. We have opportunity to force them to take responsibility which will reset that balance. It doesn't take much. When you realise you'll be driving at 20mph max and yielding priority to normal people everywhere driving suddenly won't seem so attractive. None of this is new restrictions on driving, it's just what they should have been doing anyway.

How do you feel about constant monitoring of trains or aeroplanes? If a train driver crosses a red signal it's straight to prison. When your actions can have such an impact on individuals and societies then your individual right to privacy is invalid.

replies(1): >>44353633 #
2. casenmgreen ◴[] No.44353633[source]
> This isn't about constant monitoring of people

It seems to me it is a probe.

If it is accepted for cars, then it moves on to people.

Then it is used by ICE to pay rewards for handing over people Donald has decided are illegal.

replies(3): >>44353812 #>>44355667 #>>44357752 #
3. globular-toast ◴[] No.44353812[source]
Yes, care must be taken. These kinds of measures should only be taken when an existing power imbalance is already in place. We have laws to stop these imbalances, for example you can't use your might to force and coerce people. Do you think it's wrong for someone to be able to report an assault?

Cars are currently a huge power imbalance that needs to be evened out.

But, sure, some people will want to use the same technology to create new imbalances or further existing ones. That doesn't mean the technology itself is bad.

4. Kbelicius ◴[] No.44355667[source]
This is called the slippery slope fallacy. It is a fallacy for a reason.
replies(1): >>44357763 #
5. potato3732842 ◴[] No.44357752[source]
My fear isn't that this will stop after the truck drivers, the immigrants, etc, etc, have all been harmed but before the people who peddled the policy
6. potato3732842 ◴[] No.44357763{3}[source]
They always somehow run out of will to continue to harm people after those who can't resist have been harmed but right before the tech bros and out of touch white women who peddled and popularized the policy that lead to the harm start being on the receiving end of it all.