←back to thread

156 points ant6n | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.471s | source

Hi HN, I'm Anton, founder of Luna Rail.

I've always thought night trains are a fantastic, sustainable alternative to short-haul flights, but they're often held back by a lack of privacy, comfort, and poor economics due to low passenger capacity.

I became overly fascinated with this puzzle. I view it as a kind of night train Tetris (my wife less charitably calls it "sardinology"). I spent way too much time learning about and sketching various layouts, trying to figure out how to fit the maximum number of private cabins into a standard railcar, while making them attractive for both day and night travel.

This eventually led to a physical workshop (in Berlin) and a hands-on rapid prototyping process. We've built a series of full-scale mockups, starting with wood and cardboard and progressing to high-fidelity versions with 3D-printed and CNC-milled parts, with various functional elements.

Hundreds of people have come in to test our various iterations, because you can't test ergonomics or comfort by looking at renderings (although we did create a bunch of nice ones).

The link goes to our home page showing our approach and some of the thinking behind them. It’s been a lot of fun working on this puzzle, and we're excited to share what we've come up with. We hope you think it's cool too and would love to hear your thoughts.

Show context
econ ◴[] No.44343728[source]
I've long joked that modules should be made easy to swap with a forklift. Trains are usually full of small defects that aren't serious enough to take them out of service.

If they are comfortable you could rent out the cabins when not in use either fitted on the train or not. You could also retire the units there.

You could make a platform only and make it easy for others to design modules in a broad price range. Maybe most modules should be in storage until booked.

You could park the "hotel" module on the destination and put it back on the train for the return trip.

replies(2): >>44344055 #>>44351611 #
1. danpalmer ◴[] No.44351611[source]
> I've long joked that modules should be made easy to swap with a forklift. Trains are usually full of small defects that aren't serious enough to take them out of service.

I assume the implication here is that with more granular swap-outs, you might get more regular maintenance of those minor issues?

While I agree it's a problem and could be improved, I don't find train maintenance any worse than hotel maintenance in general – most hotel rooms aren't in perfect condition and they arguably don't have the same restrictions.

replies(1): >>44365484 #
2. econ ◴[] No.44365484[source]
You don't have to shut down the hotel and cancel reservations for a leaking sink. Hotel rooms are also pretty cheap to make.