←back to thread

645 points ReadCarlBarks | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
tolerance ◴[] No.44334333[source]
I would much rather check my writing against grammatical rules that are hard coded in an open source program—meaning that I can change them—than ones that I imagine would be subject to prompt fiddling or worse; implicitly hard coded in a tangle of training data that the LLM would draw from.

The Neovim configuration for the LSP looks neat: https://writewithharper.com/docs/integrations/neovim

The whole thing seems cool. Automattic should mention this on their homepage. Tools like this are the future of something.

replies(2): >>44335438 #>>44336086 #
triknomeister ◴[] No.44335438[source]
You would lose out on evolution of language.
replies(3): >>44335826 #>>44337273 #>>44337956 #
phoe-krk ◴[] No.44335826[source]
Natural languages evolve so slowly that writing and editing rules for them is easily achievable even this way. Think years versus minutes.
replies(2): >>44336057 #>>44336245 #
fakedang ◴[] No.44336245[source]
Aight you win fam, I was trippin fr. You're absolutely bussin, no cap. Harvard should be taking notes.

(^^ alien language that was developed in less than a decade)

replies(4): >>44336259 #>>44336266 #>>44337030 #>>44339957 #
1. dmoy ◴[] No.44339957[source]
Pedantically,

aight, trippin, fr (at least the spoken version), and fam were all very common in the 1990s (which was the last decade I was able to speak like that without getting jeered at by peers).