←back to thread

845 points the-anarchist | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
boramalper ◴[] No.44334361[source]
I suspect a strong link between mass surveillance (by corporations for advertising or by states for intelligence purposes) and the very recent targeting of the senior Iranian nuclear scientist and military officers at their homes in Iran.

Wherever you are from or whatever side of the conflict you are on, I think we can all agree that it’s never been easier to infer so much about a person from “semi-public” sources such as companies selling customer data and built-in apps that spy on their users and call home. It allows intelligence agencies to outsource intelligence gathering to the market, which is probably cheaper and a lot more convenient than traditional methods.

“Privacy is a human right” landed on deaf ears but hopefully politicians will soon realise that it’s a matter of national security too.

replies(13): >>44334595 #>>44334624 #>>44334697 #>>44334773 #>>44335164 #>>44335631 #>>44336225 #>>44336629 #>>44337014 #>>44337349 #>>44338148 #>>44344811 #>>44346475 #
lm28469 ◴[] No.44337014[source]
If you're a valuable enough target, like these Iranians generals/scientists they just need to find you once and then they can continuously track your movements via satellite. They don't need much precision, just which building to level
replies(2): >>44337862 #>>44339636 #
mousethatroared ◴[] No.44337862[source]
"Just which building to level"

What's "just" a war crime amongst friends?

replies(2): >>44339006 #>>44339673 #
Henchman21 ◴[] No.44339006{3}[source]
When there is no one willing to prosecute it, is it still a crime?
replies(3): >>44339186 #>>44339638 #>>44342191 #
1. consp ◴[] No.44339186{4}[source]
Yes, though one without consequences. Until the next guy comes along and actually enforced it.