←back to thread

645 points ReadCarlBarks | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
1. loughnane ◴[] No.44338311[source]
Surprised coming into this that I don't see anyone mentioning vale[0]. I've been using it for ~4 years now and love it.

I use grammarly briefly when it came out and liked the idea. Admittedly it has more polish than vale for people writing in google docs, &c. Still, I stick with Vale. Is there any case for moving to Harper?

[0] https://vale.sh/

replies(2): >>44338408 #>>44339285 #
2. aDyslecticCrow ◴[] No.44338408[source]
Looks interesting for linting and cleaning markdown documentation, but it doesn't seem like a very competent "spellcheck". I'll check it out... but it doesn't actually do the same thing as Grammarly or Harper.
3. WhyNotHugo ◴[] No.44339285[source]
Vale requires a lot of tweaking, and I’ve never been able to get a rule set with which I’m happy.

It’s missing a default rule set with rules that are generally okay without being too opinionated.