←back to thread

990 points smitop | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
mcdeltat ◴[] No.44333721[source]
I recently stopped watching youtube altogether and surprisingly haven't been missing it. And I used to watch a LOT (like hours per day) of youtube, mostly quality educational/scientific content. But ultimately you'd be surprised how much you don't need in your life. And side effect is no more ads. If someone sends me an occasional youtube video to watch, I'll take a look, but otherwise no engagement with the platform.

I'd highly recommend everyone try reducing their intake of passive entertainment like youtube and redirecting that time towards more creative or mindful pursuits.

replies(12): >>44333759 #>>44333869 #>>44333888 #>>44333939 #>>44333942 #>>44334056 #>>44334471 #>>44334568 #>>44334750 #>>44334783 #>>44334859 #>>44336871 #
stickfigure ◴[] No.44333888[source]
Or just pay for it? I have my whole family on my plan. Nobody gets ads. It is a bargain.

You're right, I could probably finish my motorcycle build projects without videos. But why??

replies(15): >>44334073 #>>44334088 #>>44334144 #>>44334344 #>>44334406 #>>44334447 #>>44334475 #>>44334803 #>>44335046 #>>44336056 #>>44336525 #>>44336900 #>>44338528 #>>44338880 #>>44349185 #
solannou ◴[] No.44334447[source]
I'm barely sure that the long term strategy of YouTube is "more ads". The premium account won't be always ads free
replies(3): >>44334628 #>>44334703 #>>44337840 #
motoxpro ◴[] No.44334703[source]
This is a big misunderstanding of the business model. The price might go up, but there will always be a tier with no ads.
replies(2): >>44334792 #>>44341124 #
pclmulqdq ◴[] No.44334792[source]
Unfortunately, the way ads work, the people who pay to avoid ads are inevitably the ones worth advertising to. The Nash equilibrium is that every user sees ads.
replies(2): >>44334871 #>>44382018 #
tshaddox ◴[] No.44334871[source]
That sounds off to me. I would think that the people who pay to avoid ads are very likely to jump to ad blockers if the ad-free subscription ceases to exist. Not to mention that they’re going to be very unlikely to convert on advertising.
replies(2): >>44336778 #>>44338254 #
1. StackRanker3000 ◴[] No.44338254[source]
The paid service would of course have to offer something else other than “no ads” if they started showing ads in it

The type of people who have already indicated that they have disposable income, and are willing to pay for a service, are more attractive to advertisers than people who are known to have opted for a worse experience for free