←back to thread

845 points the-anarchist | 2 comments | | HN request time: 2.28s | source
Show context
boramalper ◴[] No.44334361[source]
I suspect a strong link between mass surveillance (by corporations for advertising or by states for intelligence purposes) and the very recent targeting of the senior Iranian nuclear scientist and military officers at their homes in Iran.

Wherever you are from or whatever side of the conflict you are on, I think we can all agree that it’s never been easier to infer so much about a person from “semi-public” sources such as companies selling customer data and built-in apps that spy on their users and call home. It allows intelligence agencies to outsource intelligence gathering to the market, which is probably cheaper and a lot more convenient than traditional methods.

“Privacy is a human right” landed on deaf ears but hopefully politicians will soon realise that it’s a matter of national security too.

replies(13): >>44334595 #>>44334624 #>>44334697 #>>44334773 #>>44335164 #>>44335631 #>>44336225 #>>44336629 #>>44337014 #>>44337349 #>>44338148 #>>44344811 #>>44346475 #
FilosofumRex ◴[] No.44334697[source]
Almost all of Iran's cell network system was originally installed by S. Korean firms. They've changed some to Chinese brands, but apparently the compromised S. Korean brands are still around.
replies(2): >>44334967 #>>44336055 #
Digital28 ◴[] No.44334967[source]
Changing from SK to CN is a trade from intentional vulnerability to unintentional vulnerability. I’ve yet to see a secure piece of software come out of China in my 30+ years of coding.
replies(6): >>44336400 #>>44336611 #>>44336759 #>>44337107 #>>44337336 #>>44339744 #
jeroenhd ◴[] No.44337107[source]
When a security analysis was done of Chinese parts of the Dutch mobile network, that was pretty much the conclusion: Chinese vendors deliver software and components full of vulnerabilities, but none of them seem to be intentional.

Since then there has been a movement to reduce Chinese vendors in general our if security concerns, as well as to improve the security posture of the mobile networks by doing things like "encrypting connections" and "switching away from telnet".

On the other hand, the Chinese managed to break into the US wiretapping system, so it's not like other networks aren't vulnerable either.

replies(1): >>44337329 #
1. vardump ◴[] No.44337329[source]
> Chinese vendors deliver software and components full of vulnerabilities, but none of them seem to be intentional.

Plausible deniability.

replies(1): >>44340003 #
2. GTP ◴[] No.44340003[source]
If we're talking about cheap products, then it's more likely due to cost savings rather than malice. But yeah, no one can give you defitive proof of this.