←back to thread

845 points the-anarchist | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
boramalper ◴[] No.44334361[source]
I suspect a strong link between mass surveillance (by corporations for advertising or by states for intelligence purposes) and the very recent targeting of the senior Iranian nuclear scientist and military officers at their homes in Iran.

Wherever you are from or whatever side of the conflict you are on, I think we can all agree that it’s never been easier to infer so much about a person from “semi-public” sources such as companies selling customer data and built-in apps that spy on their users and call home. It allows intelligence agencies to outsource intelligence gathering to the market, which is probably cheaper and a lot more convenient than traditional methods.

“Privacy is a human right” landed on deaf ears but hopefully politicians will soon realise that it’s a matter of national security too.

replies(13): >>44334595 #>>44334624 #>>44334697 #>>44334773 #>>44335164 #>>44335631 #>>44336225 #>>44336629 #>>44337014 #>>44337349 #>>44338148 #>>44344811 #>>44346475 #
FilosofumRex ◴[] No.44334697[source]
Almost all of Iran's cell network system was originally installed by S. Korean firms. They've changed some to Chinese brands, but apparently the compromised S. Korean brands are still around.
replies(2): >>44334967 #>>44336055 #
throw123xz ◴[] No.44336055[source]
It's a mistake to assume that a very capable country can't get into a network that uses Chinese equipment/software.
replies(1): >>44336390 #
Dah00n ◴[] No.44336390[source]
It's also a mistake to assume that a very capable country can't get into a network that uses US equipment/software... especially Cisco equipment with all the "forgotten" hardcoded logins. Iran is better off with Chinese equipment than American or Korean.
replies(3): >>44336552 #>>44336731 #>>44361773 #
kragen ◴[] No.44336552[source]
Nobody knows enough to say whether Iran is better off with Chinese equipment, because most of the intentional backdoors on every side of this struggle remain undiscovered by the other sides.
replies(1): >>44336643 #
1. dse1982 ◴[] No.44336643[source]
Well, China is more on the side of Iran than the US or US allies. So there is that.
replies(1): >>44336654 #
2. kragen ◴[] No.44336654[source]
Yes, but that doesn't imply they want Iran's telecommunications network to be a black box to the PLA.