←back to thread

991 points smitop | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
tlogan ◴[] No.44333733[source]
Why do we justify blocking ads, even when we know the content we’re consuming isn’t free to create and even if the content is free, it still costs money to store and distribute?

We often rationalize using ad blockers because ads can be intrusive or annoying. But let’s asking ourselves: Why do we feel entitled to get this for free?

This isn’t a moral judgment. I genuinely want to understand the reasoning.

replies(49): >>44333779 #>>44333788 #>>44333809 #>>44333847 #>>44333851 #>>44333917 #>>44333925 #>>44333935 #>>44333977 #>>44333979 #>>44334008 #>>44334026 #>>44334039 #>>44334057 #>>44334068 #>>44334120 #>>44334256 #>>44334258 #>>44334326 #>>44334366 #>>44334430 #>>44334456 #>>44334488 #>>44334625 #>>44334645 #>>44334677 #>>44334690 #>>44334714 #>>44334842 #>>44334900 #>>44334969 #>>44334990 #>>44335255 #>>44335327 #>>44335367 #>>44335440 #>>44335725 #>>44335854 #>>44336166 #>>44336167 #>>44336232 #>>44336588 #>>44336691 #>>44336977 #>>44337218 #>>44337527 #>>44339047 #>>44340657 #>>44374533 #
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.44334057[source]
Just want to point out, adding on to OP, that creators on youtube get 55% of revenue.

I get that Google has infinite money and infinite evil. But how convenient you also get to skip out on paying the majority expense, which goes to the creator...

And yes virtuous commentor, I know you are one of the 1.5% that convert to a patreon supporter. Now ask everyone else why they get to eat for free (while endlessly complaining that the restaurant sucks).

replies(4): >>44334465 #>>44334747 #>>44335021 #>>44336068 #
1. spixy ◴[] No.44336068[source]
Right, because all that hardware needed for storing and streaming all that video is free.

55% is OK