←back to thread

645 points ReadCarlBarks | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.262s | source
Show context
pram ◴[] No.44332656[source]
IMO not using LLMs is a big plus in my book. Grammarly has been going downhill since they've been larding it with "AI features," it has become remarkably inconsistent. It will tell me to remove a comma one hour, and then tell me to add it back the next.
replies(8): >>44333107 #>>44333469 #>>44333551 #>>44334925 #>>44335818 #>>44336321 #>>44336504 #>>44337473 #
raincole ◴[] No.44333107[source]
So is there a similar tool but based on an LLM?

Not that I think LLM is always better, but it would be interesting to compare these two approaches.

replies(2): >>44333434 #>>44335702 #
1. mannycalavera42 ◴[] No.44335702[source]
Grammarly is (was) written in Common LISP https://www.grammarly.com/blog/engineering/running-lisp-in-p...

Given LISP was supposed to build "The AI" ... pretty sad than a dumb LLM is taking its place now