←back to thread

990 points smitop | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.634s | source
Show context
ysavir ◴[] No.44330236[source]
I've been getting these buffer loading times recently, and ironically, I don't mind them all that much. The annoyance of ads isn't primarily in the time it takes up, but in having the audio play and a video feed run that isn't the video I clicked on.

If an actual ad played, I'd be irritated beyond belief. But when there's a 12 second buffer, I have enough patience training for slow load times that I instinctively just quickly check my email or spend a brief moment lost in thought. Especially when it's every video. If it was one in every 5 videos, I'd notice it and be bothered. When it's every video, it's part of the experience and my brain just cuts it out automatically.

replies(3): >>44333050 #>>44337196 #>>44340994 #
MathMonkeyMan ◴[] No.44333050[source]
Yeah I've been getting the initial delay with the popup "find out why playback is slow." No thanks, I already know, and it's not so bad.
replies(3): >>44333257 #>>44333259 #>>44334777 #
Toritori12 ◴[] No.44333259[source]
Out of curiosity I clicked the link and it is funny how they try to blame the extension when is them actually causing the problem.
replies(1): >>44333450 #
HDThoreaun ◴[] No.44333450[source]
The extension is stealing from them. I get stealing a zero marginal cost good is minor but the agreement you make with YouTube is that you watch an ad in exchange for the video. Why should they serve you the video if you refuse your part of the agreement?
replies(7): >>44333547 #>>44333595 #>>44333604 #>>44333656 #>>44334023 #>>44334640 #>>44334882 #
1. tshaddox ◴[] No.44334882[source]
I never agreed to that. Shrinkwrap contracts don’t count. Also, if they don’t want to serve me the video without ads, they’re welcome to do that.
replies(1): >>44334956 #
2. aucisson_masque ◴[] No.44334956[source]
> Also, if they don’t want to serve me the video without ads, they’re welcome to do that.

That’s what they are actually trying to do lol.

replies(1): >>44335616 #
3. tshaddox ◴[] No.44335616[source]
Are they really trying? They have vast resources and engineering talent. I doubt they are sincerely trying and failing to implement something that radio and broadcast television have managed to do for the better part of a century.