←back to thread

YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

(iter.ca)
991 points smitop | 1 comments | 20 Jun 25 17:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
sc11 ◴[20 Jun 25 18:11 UTC] No.44330344[source]▶
I'd be happy to pay for premium if it actually removed all ads from the platform. I wish they forced creators to declare which segments of a video are ads for their sponsors and then removed or skipped them for premium users. Basically built-in Sponsorblock except not crowd-sourced.

Alternatively, many creators already upload ad-free versions to their Patreon or other paywalled platforms, they could upload those to YouTube as well to be shown to premium users if YT allowed for it and forced them to.

Alas I'm not willing to pay 13€ a month for just slightly fewer ads.

replies(2): >>44331877 #>>44334241 #
dingaling ◴[20 Jun 25 20:39 UTC] No.44331877[source]▶
I don't think YouTube should get further into the dangerous spiral of chaperoning the content of videos. If there are too many sponsored segments in a video, take it up with the creator or stop watching that channel.
replies(2): >>44333805 #>>44334094 #
yugioh3 ◴[21 Jun 25 01:46 UTC] No.44333805[source]▶
yeah I think the free market can figure ad load out. creators who go overboard on sponsored segments will get less views, less engagement. there's a natural equilibrium.
replies(1): >>44334739 #
1. oblio ◴[21 Jun 25 05:20 UTC] No.44334739[source]▶
In many countries ad sections have to be clearly marked for another reason the "free market" hasn't solved: disguised advertising. I wish the US got with the times.