←back to thread

990 points smitop | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
absurdo ◴[] No.44330164[source]
I was wondering when buffering was going to be a thing. I’ve been seeing it on YT and figured it’s the Adblock wars getting heated up.

The next step is to scrape the videos, strip the ads, store them on a torrent magnet and serve that instead. Yes it would have to be from a shady RU or CN or NK or IN site. I’m fine with that.

replies(2): >>44333510 #>>44333512 #
nickff[dead post] ◴[] No.44333510[source]
[flagged]
1. Aachen ◴[] No.44333901[source]
Consider that it's a monopoly. You can't get 99% of this content anywhere else (not even if it's marked as creative commons¹ or any other free license, publicly funded, etc.) but I don't agree with Google's/Alphabet's practices either. One could:

Option 1: be a hermit and not watch anything on YouTube ever. You can't look up repair guides, fully use a news website that I'm subscribed to that got rid of their self hosted version, watch a subset of public broadcasts that we pay for via taxes, etc. It's not just entertainment / a Netflix replacement

Option 2: give in and enrich this monopolistic tracking company

Option 3: try to pirate the content

I'd feel very different if this were Spotify or an individual artist: I can use three other music services with massively overlapping offerings from different jurisdictions. Or supermarkets, for the same reason. But if it's irreplaceable and gatekept, I can understand both sides here

¹ https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797468?hl=en