←back to thread

990 points smitop | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
ttyyzz ◴[] No.44330288[source]
Having to pay for something so that's "less annoying" is the worst business model. YouTube Premium is very expensive. I had it for a while when I got a Pixel smartphone with a few months of YouTube Premium included. It was great. I also understand that streaming on this scale must entail incredibly high operating costs; the money has to come from somewhere. It's simply a dilemma. But there has to be a better way. Any ideas?
replies(8): >>44330305 #>>44330334 #>>44330460 #>>44333022 #>>44333268 #>>44333389 #>>44333482 #>>44333786 #
sidrag22 ◴[] No.44333389[source]
its creating a problem and selling the solution to that problem. im surprised there isnt more of a distaste for youtube out there for just their overall product... ads aside. One of the better things ive done for myself this past year is remove the right sidebar as well as almost all of the homepage.

my youtube homepage is just that left sidebar, which has dots if a new video for one of the channels i care about uploads. It totally frees me from clickbait thumbnails, and "youtube rabbit holes".

youtube has just been getting slaughtered with horrible trends of mindless content, low effort documentary stuff, all sorts of low effort garbage with high effort thumbnails/titles. it is so nice to just rid myself of all of it.

replies(1): >>44333426 #
frollogaston ◴[] No.44333426[source]
They created the product before creating the problem
replies(1): >>44333524 #
1. sidrag22 ◴[] No.44333524[source]
market capture and figure out monetization later :)

like a forest preserve deciding theyd like billboards in the middle of their paths after a few years.