←back to thread

990 points smitop | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.267s | source
Show context
ttyyzz ◴[] No.44330288[source]
Having to pay for something so that's "less annoying" is the worst business model. YouTube Premium is very expensive. I had it for a while when I got a Pixel smartphone with a few months of YouTube Premium included. It was great. I also understand that streaming on this scale must entail incredibly high operating costs; the money has to come from somewhere. It's simply a dilemma. But there has to be a better way. Any ideas?
replies(8): >>44330305 #>>44330334 #>>44330460 #>>44333022 #>>44333268 #>>44333389 #>>44333482 #>>44333786 #
xandrius ◴[] No.44330305[source]
Create a built-in Patreon to access premium videos and communities and take a cut.
replies(1): >>44330429 #
nick_g ◴[] No.44330429[source]
They’re attempting that now with “memberships.” I’m not a heavy patreon user, but the current implementation leaves a lot to be desired. I expect they’ll be able to iterate on it.

An unfortunate aspect is that I’m frequently recommended videos which I would have to pay to watch. As a youtube premium subscriber, feeling like I’m constantly being upsold has begun to grate on me. I’d really appreciate a feature to hide these videos as a premium subscriber, which I have little faith in them implementing. On my laptop it’s easy enough to hide these thumbnails (as I already do with shorts) using ublock origin. However this is making me reconsider my subscription. Why should I have to use a third party tool to best use this service which I’m paying a fairly significant fee for? I’ve similarly used ublock origin to work around recent change where only three videos were shown on each row

replies(1): >>44333413 #
1. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.44333413[source]
> An unfortunate aspect is that I’m frequently recommended videos which I would have to pay to watch.

That's older than the "membership" concept. They licensed a bunch of television and movies and made them pay-per-view.