←back to thread

YouTube's new anti-adblock measures

(iter.ca)
990 points smitop | 1 comments | 20 Jun 25 17:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.243s | source
Show context
ttyyzz ◴[20 Jun 25 18:06 UTC] No.44330288[source]▶
Having to pay for something so that's "less annoying" is the worst business model. YouTube Premium is very expensive. I had it for a while when I got a Pixel smartphone with a few months of YouTube Premium included. It was great. I also understand that streaming on this scale must entail incredibly high operating costs; the money has to come from somewhere. It's simply a dilemma. But there has to be a better way. Any ideas?
replies(8): >>44330305 #>>44330334 #>>44330460 #>>44333022 #>>44333268 #>>44333389 #>>44333482 #>>44333786 #
thallium205 ◴[20 Jun 25 18:10 UTC] No.44330334[source]▶
Youtube Premium is very expensive?
replies(1): >>44330612 #
ttyyzz ◴[20 Jun 25 18:37 UTC] No.44330612[source]▶
I would pay that 130€ / year if I was alone. I have to be responsible with the money I earn as I have to feed 3 kids and my wife is not working. We also use other different streaming services like netflix, spotify family... adding youtube premium seems not reasonable for me at the moment.
replies(2): >>44332988 #>>44333844 #
1. antoniojtorres ◴[20 Jun 25 23:13 UTC] No.44332988[source]▶
Commenting to share my experience: I ran into and ended up with youtube because it bundles youtube music as well, allowing me to consolidate. I was able to invite my household to the same account.

I also wanted to ensure my views resulted in the creators being paid, it goes without saying that the royalties for streaming are abysmal and is a separate conversation, but it was a contributing factor for me.