←back to thread

1479 points sandslash | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.668s | source
Show context
Aeroi ◴[] No.44318633[source]
the fanboying for this dudes opinion is insane.
replies(4): >>44319105 #>>44319723 #>>44321888 #>>44323671 #
1. dang ◴[] No.44321888[source]
Maybe so, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News.

(Thoughtful criticism that we can learn from is welcome, of course. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.)

replies(1): >>44323931 #
2. Aeroi ◴[] No.44323931[source]
I'd argue that expressing contrarian sentiment can be substantive. Otherwise this would be an echo-chamber of agreement.
replies(1): >>44324446 #
3. dang ◴[] No.44324446[source]
For sure, expressing contrarian sentiment can be substantive, but you'd need to do it substantively.