←back to thread

1479 points sandslash | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
blixt ◴[] No.44319312[source]
If we extrapolate these points about building tools for AI and letting the AI turn prompts into code I can’t help but reach the conclusion that future programming languages and their runtimes will be heavily influenced by the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs.

What would the code of an application look like if it was optimized to be efficiently used by LLMs and not humans?

* While LLMs do heavily tend towards expecting the same inputs/outputs as humans because of the training data I don’t think this would inhibit co-evolution of novel representations of software.

replies(5): >>44319394 #>>44319410 #>>44319413 #>>44319434 #>>44320601 #
1. s_ting765 ◴[] No.44320601[source]
Given the plethora of programming languages that exist today, I'm not worried at all about AI taking over SWE jobs.