←back to thread

502 points SupremumLimit | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mort96 ◴[] No.44316578[source]
I was interested in Zed, but lost all interest when they started integrating "AI". I'm tired of "AI" everywhere.

I'll just stick with Neovim until something better comes around. Which probably won't happen until after the "AI" bubble bursts.

replies(12): >>44316614 #>>44316634 #>>44316729 #>>44316830 #>>44316947 #>>44317120 #>>44317364 #>>44318004 #>>44319158 #>>44320333 #>>44320677 #>>44321186 #
norman784 ◴[] No.44316947[source]
I didn't tried Zed in a while, are really intrusive the AI features? Can't it be just disabled with some configuration?
replies(3): >>44316986 #>>44317009 #>>44317383 #
deliriumchn ◴[] No.44317009[source]
they are not intrusive but their entire focus changed on that instead of other features. Entire Git view feels abandoned in half done state yet they spent entire month working on AI chats, AI agents, their own AI edit (that's priced 20 per month yet they boast how light and performant it is -- why isn't it free local model then and why its priced worse than copilot?)

They're moving from "making awesome code editor" into yet another "buy our ai" product

replies(6): >>44317017 #>>44317035 #>>44317413 #>>44318819 #>>44320082 #>>44320813 #
nsonha ◴[] No.44317413[source]
I'm much prefer the VS Code style when you have 2 clear sections: staged and not staged. Zed's chose the IntelliJ style which is just a bunch of checkboxes, I can see it being easier to understand for the novice, but not very intuitive from a git point of view.
replies(1): >>44318964 #
1. norman784 ◴[] No.44318964[source]
Never used Git in Jetbrain IDEs or Zed (yet), but recently VS Code improved a lot the Git by making easier to stage changes in a file in a granular manner (I tried briefly edamagit extension a while ago and now use a lot gitu in the terminal, in combination with VS Code version control).