←back to thread

523 points sva_ | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.278s | source
Show context
Zaheer ◴[] No.44314495[source]
Original DHS Announcement on Social Media Screening: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-to-begin-sc...

State Dept on what is considered Antisemitism: https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/

These definitions are intentionally broad and designed to censor criticism of Israel. You have more freedom to criticize the US Government than to criticize a foreign country.

replies(13): >>44314526 #>>44314820 #>>44315087 #>>44315104 #>>44315309 #>>44315447 #>>44315680 #>>44316478 #>>44316738 #>>44318457 #>>44319156 #>>44322666 #>>44327381 #
hearsathought ◴[] No.44315104[source]
Does the DHS also screen for people who post anti-chinese, anti-russian, anti-canadian, anti-mexican, etc social media posts? Why screen for anti-israel comments only? I'm guessing they are not screening for anti-palestinian or anti-muslim posts.

Imagine if DHS said they are going to ban anyone who criticizes china or russia or saudi arabia from traveling to the US? Both the republicans and democratics would be raising hell. Why the silence when it comes to israel?

What Homeland is DHS securing? The US or Israel? Why is it that so much of our political class openly and unabashedly act like agents of israel? Doesn't matter who you vote for. Republican or democrat. As soon as they are elected, they all grovel for israel. How many wars are we going to fight for israel? How many american colleges are we going to attack for israel? How many people are we going to censor for israel? Just doesn't make any sense.

replies(8): >>44315201 #>>44315262 #>>44315611 #>>44315705 #>>44316625 #>>44317723 #>>44319321 #>>44328090 #
1. jampekka ◴[] No.44316625[source]
> Why is it that so much of our political class openly and unabashedly act like agents of israel?

According to Jimmy Carter:

"The many controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to peace for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other nations — but not in the United States. For the last 30 years, I have witnessed and experienced the severe restraints on any free and balanced discussion of the facts. This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American-Israel Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary voices.

It would be almost politically suicidal for members of Congress to espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine, to suggest that Israel comply with international law or to speak in defense of justice or human rights for Palestinians."

https://www.latimes.com/news/la-oe-carter8dec08-story.html

Carter was of course widely (and absurdly) slandered as an antisemite. He probably wouldn't get a visa.

replies(1): >>44321511 #
2. const_cast ◴[] No.44321984[source]
> Oh yeah, "Jews control the government", such a new trope that has nothing to do with antisemitism.

He didn't say that.

> know two members of Congress speaking frequently in defense of Palestine

This is your evidence? Really? I mean, do you guys hear yourselves?

Two members of congress? Out of hundreds? Two members who, might I remind everyone, are constantly accused of being anti-American communists?

> Was it almost politically suicidal for them?

Yes! These two are treated like the scum of the Earth by 100% of the American right and 80% of the American left!

It's not even debatable that the US is absurdly pro-Israel. I don't know what we're even arguing here. Zionists should all agree that Zionism is good, right? So why are we arguing that Zionists are some sort of minority? You should be ecstatic that our government is explicitly Zionist!

replies(1): >>44322213 #
3. EvgeniyZh ◴[] No.44322213{3}[source]
> He didn't say that.

Sure, you replace "Jews" by "Zionists" and then every trope is ok. It's Zionists who have the power to influence or direct US government behavior (i.e., control it).

> Two members of congress? Out of hundreds?

Well yeah, to show something possible it's enough to show one example.

> Yes!

How is being elected to Congress political suicide?

> It's not even debatable that the US is absurdly pro-Israel.

I'm not debating that. I'm debating the idea that this is somehow doing of evil Zionist lobby or that repeating antisemitic tropes is not antisemitic because you euphemize Jews by Zionists

replies(2): >>44322246 #>>44323028 #
4. jampekka ◴[] No.44323028{4}[source]
> Well yeah, to show something possible it's enough to show one example.

AIPAC used almost 20 million dollars to defeat Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush, for example.

replies(1): >>44325029 #
5. EvgeniyZh ◴[] No.44325029{5}[source]
So out of 9 members of "the Squad", 7 were reelected and only 2 outed? Quite inefficient suicide in my book.