←back to thread

447 points hemant6488 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
nancyminusone ◴[] No.44312819[source]
>I’m saving approximately $84-120 CAD annually.

I suppose most of this is eaten up by the need to pay apple $99 per year just to run your own app on your own phone for longer than a week.

replies(8): >>44313113 #>>44313215 #>>44313586 #>>44313614 #>>44313718 #>>44314240 #>>44314560 #>>44315930 #
behnamoh ◴[] No.44313215[source]
This Apple fee is one of the most absurd things they do. Like, how is it even justified—does Apple really spend $99 on infra maintenance and server costs to host your app?

When I buy a device I want to know that I own it, but Apple keeps pushing the narrative that "we LET you use this device in ways we see fit". So basically the customer is just borrowing a device from Apple while paying the full price.

I'm a longtime Apple user but can't shake off this love-hate relationship with the company.

replies(10): >>44313272 #>>44313280 #>>44314081 #>>44314098 #>>44314944 #>>44315377 #>>44315748 #>>44317717 #>>44320005 #>>44320589 #
notnmeyer ◴[] No.44313280[source]
i’d guess it’s more to keep extremely low effort submissions out of the app store.
replies(2): >>44313611 #>>44314579 #
Gigachad ◴[] No.44313611[source]
Which is not unreasonable for something listed in the App Store. It is unreasonable that you can’t sideload though.
replies(1): >>44313754 #
phire ◴[] No.44313754{3}[source]
I'm pretty sure the $99 fee is explicitly there to prevent "normal" users from side-loading.
replies(2): >>44313984 #>>44314807 #
1. notnmeyer ◴[] No.44314807{4}[source]
yeah, this also makes sense