←back to thread

1355 points LorenDB | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.422s | source
Show context
whatever1 ◴[] No.44300677[source]
Question why is it so easy today to build reusable rockets? Is it because the onboard cpu speed of the chips can solve more granular control problems with low latency?
replies(17): >>44300707 #>>44300730 #>>44300742 #>>44300756 #>>44300762 #>>44300776 #>>44300818 #>>44300828 #>>44300964 #>>44301068 #>>44301170 #>>44301448 #>>44301882 #>>44301989 #>>44302135 #>>44307276 #>>44308491 #
kurthr ◴[] No.44300707[source]
Proof of concept. It's a lot easier to do something, if you know it can be done.
replies(4): >>44300789 #>>44300803 #>>44300852 #>>44301675 #
bookofjoe ◴[] No.44301675[source]
See, for example: 4-minute mile
replies(1): >>44309482 #
1. LeifCarrotson ◴[] No.44309482[source]
I don't know how relevant that is. That's something that can be done by an individual, training for something slightly slower than 4 minutes and pushing through to achieve a time that onlookers might not have expected.

The real friction in building a reusable rocket isn't the engineering, it's setting "let's build a reusable rocket" as a design goal, and getting a whole bunch of engineers and a whole bunch of dollars to start on that goal.

You have to start with a whiteboard sketch and board-room presentation that shows it's achievable, and then send the engineers out to refine the sketch into something worth funding, and then work for months or years to build a rocket that would be a disaster if it's not achievable.

replies(1): >>44309578 #
2. bookofjoe ◴[] No.44309578[source]
>Proof of concept. It's a lot easier to do something, if you know it can be done.

This.

What I wanted to emphasize was how, after Bannister finally broke through the 4-minute barrier, many others did it soon after: 3 more in 1954; 4 in 1955; 3 in 1956; 5 in 1957; 4 in 1958.

List: https://imgur.com/a/UadE3xa