←back to thread

655 points k-ian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.368s | source
Show context
diggan ◴[] No.44302108[source]
> Is this legal?

Why wouldn't it be? You're not actually hosting a tracker in this case, only looking at incoming connections. And even if you do run a tracker, hard to make the case that the tracker itself is illega. Hosting something like opentrackr is like hosting a search engine, how they respond to legal takedown requests is where the crux is at, and whatever infra sits around the tracker, so police and courts can see/assume the intent. But trackers are pretty stupid coordination server software, would be crazy if they became illegal.

replies(8): >>44302128 #>>44302134 #>>44302420 #>>44302712 #>>44303308 #>>44303436 #>>44305263 #>>44310124 #
jedberg ◴[] No.44302134[source]
Do you think the police understand this nuance? Especially since most of the traffic that will go through there is probably copyright infringement?

They'll just see tracker and assume it's illegal.

replies(4): >>44302254 #>>44302766 #>>44306436 #>>44307437 #
SXX ◴[] No.44302766[source]
> Especially since most of the traffic that will go through there is probably copyright infringement?

Copyright infinging materials dont go "though" trackers. Trackers only keep torrent hashes and lists of peers.

replies(2): >>44304213 #>>44304377 #
1. jedberg ◴[] No.44304377[source]
I'm well aware of how trackers and torrents work. But again, do you think law enforcement understands the nuance of that?

Also the government and private companies have argued in the past that the hashes and lists of peers is inducement and enablement for copyright infringement.