Most active commenters
  • xarope(3)

←back to thread

1355 points LorenDB | 29 comments | | HN request time: 1.529s | source | bottom
1. whitehexagon ◴[] No.44301924[source]
Great clean video link thanks, but I cant work out the scale, first it looks like a toy rocket, then from the distance shot it looks huge, like spaceX huge, and then landing it looks quite small again, especially with the lawn sprinklers.

But an impressively smooth landing regardless, and I would imagine maybe harder the smaller the rocket is.

replies(4): >>44302040 #>>44302372 #>>44302429 #>>44302678 #
2. tw04 ◴[] No.44302040[source]
> successfully landed its 6.3-metre (20.6-foot) experimental reusable launch vehicle

From another article.

replies(2): >>44302754 #>>44302908 #
3. voxic11 ◴[] No.44302372[source]
Its like half the size of a Trident missile.
replies(1): >>44304285 #
4. hnburnsy ◴[] No.44302429[source]
>6.3 m in length, 85 cm in diameter, 900 kg dry weight/1,312 kg wet weight
replies(1): >>44303528 #
5. perihelions ◴[] No.44302678[source]
It's much smaller than other suborbital hop vehicles. If it's 6.3 meters, the smallest Starhopper was 18 meters; Blue Shepherd 19 m; China's Hyperbola-2Y 17 m; the Zhuque-3 VTVL test vehicle 18.3 m. Also the Grasshopper from 2012 was 32 m and even 1993's DC-X was 12 m.
replies(5): >>44303010 #>>44303703 #>>44304413 #>>44305716 #>>44310161 #
6. hbrav ◴[] No.44302754[source]
Or in natural units: three very tall men stood on top of one another, wearing a top hat.
replies(3): >>44302801 #>>44303226 #>>44303607 #
7. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.44302801{3}[source]
It's not a rocket, but three men in a trench coat?
replies(2): >>44303273 #>>44306653 #
8. imzadi ◴[] No.44302908[source]
About the height of a giraffe
replies(1): >>44306500 #
9. SECProto ◴[] No.44303010[source]
> It's much smaller than other suborbital hop vehicles.

You likely weren't being exhaustive in your listing, but I first started watching aerospace development with Armadillo Aerospace, and some of their rockets were much smaller. Their largest one was still shorter than the dc-x.

http://www.astronautix.com/q/quad.html

10. ryandrake ◴[] No.44303226{3}[source]
Oh jeez, how many football fields is that?
replies(1): >>44307030 #
11. lowestprimate ◴[] No.44303273{4}[source]
How many bananas?
12. ricardobeat ◴[] No.44303528[source]
That's just a tad longer than a north-american SUV (Escalade, Navigator) standing on it's back. Accurate to say it's a car-sized rocket.
replies(1): >>44306506 #
13. RattlesnakeJake ◴[] No.44303607{3}[source]
Are all three men wearing individual top hats, or does one cover all of them?
14. throwaway562if1 ◴[] No.44303703[source]
Electron is an 18m orbital delivery rocket (14.5m+payload without the optional third stage).
replies(1): >>44305091 #
15. gnatolf ◴[] No.44304285[source]
Which inexplicably isn't know for soft landings
16. MrSkelter ◴[] No.44304413[source]
It’s harder to land shorter vehicles. If you can land a short one the taller ones are easier.
17. kryptiskt ◴[] No.44305091{3}[source]
Japan holds the record for the smallest rocket to reach orbit with the SS-520, which put a cubesat into orbit in 2018.

Its dimensions according to Wikipedia:

Height – 31 feet (9.54 meters)

Weight – 2.9 tons (2.6 metric tons)

Diameter – 20 inches (52 centimeters)

Payload to Low-Earth Orbit – ~9 lbs (4 kg)

replies(1): >>44312190 #
18. gpm ◴[] No.44305716[source]
There's a hobbyist ~1m orbital hop vehicle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH3lR2GLgT0

Pretty sure that, or some other hobbyist project, is going to take the prize for "smallest".

19. xarope ◴[] No.44306500{3}[source]
there are giraffes that are 6m tall?!?
replies(1): >>44308316 #
20. xarope ◴[] No.44306506{3}[source]
I'm a bit confused, most cars aren't more than 3m in length. This rocket is 6.3m.

Or are there really SUVs which are > 6m in length?

replies(3): >>44307398 #>>44309377 #>>44310160 #
21. peterlada ◴[] No.44306653{4}[source]
And under the French cost is an African swallow.
22. Someone ◴[] No.44307030{4}[source]
Let’s see. 2 cm of grass on top of, say, 10 cm of earth would make the height of a football field 12cm. That would make it as high as about 50 football fields.
23. la_oveja ◴[] No.44307398{4}[source]
the mentioned suvs are 5.7m and 5.6m long, respectively
replies(1): >>44308011 #
24. xarope ◴[] No.44308011{5}[source]
wow, and I thought F350s were big
25. adrian_b ◴[] No.44308316{4}[source]
It is said that many males exceed 5.5 m in height.

A record height for a giraffe in a UK zoo was 5.8 m, but the tip of his horns was said to have reached close to 6.1 m.

So 6 m is about in this ballpark.

26. cyxxon ◴[] No.44309377{4}[source]
Huh? Even in Europe most cars are longer than 4m (a VW Golf is 4.28m for example).
27. numpad0 ◴[] No.44310160{4}[source]
Current gen Prius is about 4.5m in length, 1.8m in width, 1.5m in height. "Slightly under 5 x 2 x 1.5m" has been the standard size of a sedan for past few decades.
28. mr_toad ◴[] No.44310161[source]
The important thing about Starhopper was that it had a Raptor engine. And the Falcon 1 had a Merlin engine. They were testing with the engines they intended to put into orbit. Blue Origin are also going with orbital class engines.

I doubt that this rocket has an engine intended for orbit? So it makes me wonder how serious this program is.

29. muziq ◴[] No.44312190{4}[source]
I believe they can do 140kg to 800km, but #5 was only 4kg to a 180km x 1800km orbit..