←back to thread

713 points greenburger | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.427s | source
Show context
b0a04gl ◴[] No.44296183[source]
everyone saw this coming the day facebook bought it, but the real issue isn't ads in status . it's that the platform is now locked into meta's attention monetization engine. the founders explicitly said no ads. now not only ads, but paid channels, algorithmic exposure, and user segmentation creeping in. most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws. this isn't about revenue, it's about control. they’re reshaping a private messaging tool into a broadcast platform with tracking hooks. and most users won’t even notice until it’s too embedded to undo
replies(5): >>44296420 #>>44296685 #>>44296698 #>>44296875 #>>44297519 #
bootsmann ◴[] No.44296875[source]
> most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws

Network effects are much much smaller for messaging apps vis-a-vis social networks because there is no problem in incrementally moving your DMs from one place to another.

replies(1): >>44297049 #
whiplash451 ◴[] No.44297049[source]
There is a massive barrier to switching.

In order to switch, you also need to convince your acquaintances to switch.

Good luck with that.

replies(4): >>44297062 #>>44297240 #>>44298255 #>>44300908 #
1. upcoming-sesame ◴[] No.44298255[source]
This needs a regulatory involvement (for federation)
replies(1): >>44300542 #
2. alternatex ◴[] No.44300542[source]
That already happened in EU with trying to force leading communications platforms to integrate with at least one competitor. I remember an initiative to make WhatsApp integrate with (wait for it..) Skype.

I'm not sure how or why it fizzled out.